Genetic Analysis of a Rare Patient Case with Complex Autoimmune, Neurological, Blood, and Heart Disease Comorbidities.

Genetic Analysis of a Rare Patient Case with Complex Autoimmune, Neurological, Blood, and Heart Disease Comorbidities.

This study analyzes a rare patient with SLE, AAG, TTP, and LVNC using whole genome sequencing. It identifies common and rare genetic mutations linked to these diseases. The work highlights the value of patient-partnered genomics in understanding complex comorbidities.

Published May 5, 2025
DOI: 10.21428/a2fa6306.98b1af9a

Purpose

This study presents a detailed investigation of an undiagnosed patient exhibiting a rare combination of complex diseases, specifically systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), and left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). These conditions likely arise from an interplay between environmental triggers and genetic predispositions. Through direct collaboration with the patient and employing advanced genomic sequencing techniques, we identified significant genetic risk factors, including 149 out of 249 known SLE-associated signature mutations. Additionally, rare and likely pathogenic mutations were characterized in 18 genes associated with SLE and 5 genes associated with LVNC. We further highlighted a rare mutation in the CHRNA3 gene potentially contributing to AAG risk, and five homozygous mutations in regulatory regions linked to TTP susceptibility. Our comprehensive genomic analytic approach is reproducible and adaptable, promoting patient-centered research and facilitating data-sharing among patients, clinicians, and researchers to effectively tackle rare and complex disease cases.

Introduction

We present the case of an adult female patient with a unique combination of rare, genetic, and autoimmune diseases. The patient had an early childhood infection that led to inflammation of the epiglottis, which triggered abnormal immune responses and resulted in health complications including chronic inflammation, pain, and damage to various organs and tissues. From her teenage years to mid-twenties, she was diagnosed with autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, a rare neurological condition called autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy, and a rare blood disease known as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Additionally, following a COVID infection in her mid-forties, she was diagnosed with a rare heart disease called left ventricular non-compaction, which is typically a congenital condition influenced by genetics. Her complex symptoms are likely caused by environmental factors, such as her childhood infection, and genetic factors, including predisposing DNA polymorphisms. The previous genetic analyses did not uncover any significant markers for her conditions. Using WGS, These conditions will be reinvestigated here in a comprehensive study.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), also known as lupus, is a multisystemic autoimmune disease that can affect various body parts. The estimated prevalence ranges from 48 to 366.6 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States. SLE occurs when the immune system, which normally aims to protect the body against infections and diseases, wrongly attacks the patient’s organs through autoantibodies. This erroneous response results in inflammation and sometimes may cause permanent damage to the lungs, kidneys, skin, joints, and blood cells. Various factors may trigger lupus, including genetic predispositions, immune or inflammatory responses, and environmental stresses. Overall genetic information accounts for 30 to 40 percent of susceptibility to SԼЕ. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 100 genes associated with polygenic SLE, the common subtype resulting from multiple predisposing genetic mutations. Additionally, over 30 genes have been linked to monogenic forms of SLE, a rarer subtype in which patients carry high penetrance genetic variants in an individual gene. The genes with the highest risk include C1Q of the complement system, essential for clearing apoptotic cells, the major histocompatibility (MHC) locus, and the IFN-α pathway, which is involved in innate immunity against viral infections.

Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is a form of autonomic neuropathy in which the immune system attacks the autonomic nervous system that regulates involuntary actions such as blood pressure. AAG is extremely rare, with approximately one hundred people diagnosed each year in the United States. One hallmark is high titers of autoantibodies against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that respond to neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the autonomic ganglia, which leads to dysfunction in involuntary body functions. The cause cause of the increase in autoantibodies that result in autoimmune attacks can be idiopathic with no known causes or in response to the presence of cancer, such as small cell carcinoma. The genetic basis of AAG remains unclear. One study involving two families with familial AAG, where the condition was passed down through generations, discovered pathogenic variants in CHRNA3, which encodes the α3 subunit of the acetylcholine receptor.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a potentially life-threatening blood disorder. Thrombotic refers to blood clots, thrombocytopenic indicates a lower-than-normal platelet count, and purpura describes the purple bruises that occur due to bleeding under the skin. TTP is rare, occurring in about 1 in 100,000 people, with increased prevalence in women. The etiology arises from the ineffective degradation of large multimers of von Willebrand factor (vWF), due to deficiency from the vWF cleavage protease, ADAMTS13. Such deficiency is generally caused by autoantibodies are attacking and disabling ADAMTS13 and, in <10% of TTP patients, by inherited loss-of-function mutations in the gene ADAMTS13. This impairment results in abnormal spontaneous aggregation of platelets and subsequent coagulation within blood vessels, leading to the formation of blood clots. Additionally, excessive clotting depletes available platelets, resulting in insufficient levels when they are genuinely needed.

Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC), or noncompaction cardiomyopathy, is an unclassified heart disorder characterized by the lower left chamber (termed left ventricle) muscles not being fully packed but instead having loosened structures. The general population prevalence is estimated to be 0.05-0.1%. Genetic risk factors significantly impact LVNC, with 12 to 50 percent of individuals having a family history of the condition. Genes coding for essential proteins for the sarcomere, the basic unit of muscle, such as MYH7 and TTN, are implicated in LVNC. Risk genes associated with mitochondrial, cytoskeletal, and skeletal muscle diseases may include those associated with mitochondria, cytoskeletons, and Z-line (structures formed by nearby sarcomeres).

To our knowledge, the comorbidity of SLE, AAG, TTP, and LVNC has not been previously reported; however, these four diseases are likely interconnected. SLE, AAG, and TTP are linked with autoantibodies, consistent with the chronic inflammation likely triggered by the patient’s early childhood infection. Clinical manifestations of SLE include diverse symptoms in the vascular, cardiac, and peripheral nervous systems. Specifically, 10% of the patients with immune TTP, characterized by autoantibodies against ADAMTS13, also have SLE. Cardiac diseases are common in SLE, but cardiomyopathy is rare: only one case has been documented thus far with both SLE and LVNC. Approximately 6.9% of SLE patients experience symptoms related to the peripheral nervous system, with autonomic neuropathy, such as AAG, being even rarer. Other than the connections to SLE, LVNC could also increase the risk of thrombosis (blood clot), though the risk factors remain unclear.

In addition to environmental stress such as an early childhood infection, genetic risk factors like DNA polymorphisms could have also contributed to the symptoms. Each disease condition is estimated to have a genetic basis, ranging from low in AAG or TTP, moderate in SLE, and high in LVNC. The recent advancements in genetic testing technologies, including karyotyping, genotyping microarray, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), provide significant opportunities for identifying such genetic components of diseases. NGS, for instance, offers single-nucleotide resolution analysis for genetic mutations and typically identifies millions of mutations within a single genome. Sifting for clinically relevant mutations, however, is often hindered by the limited understanding of the diseases. For instance, AAG and TTP are rare diseases with few systematic studies. Common types of SLE and LVNC, on the other hand, are both genetically complex disorders that involve multiple genes. The associated risks are likely attributed to a wide array of mutations that are relatively common in the population, each contributing a modest effect. Additional genetic risks could include rare variants that can exert more significant individual impacts on disease manifestation. The modest effect sizes associated with common mutations, combined with the limited sample sizes for rare mutations, present significant challenges in accurately interpreting genetic risks.

Here, we collaborated with Research to the People, an open patient-partnered research platform for oncology and rare diseases. Starting with BAM and FASTQ whole genome sequencing files, we adopted a robust analytic workflow to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), small insert/deletions (Indels), and structural variants (SVs). These genetic variants were annotated with their population frequencies and the predicted deleteriousness. By comparing with the known genetic factors of the four diseases, we separately report the genetic risk factors, including common, likely predisposing SNPs, as well as the rare, likely pathogenic mutations in known disease-associated genes.

Results

Genotyping and annotation of the genetic variants

Following the best practice of using BWA to align sequencing reads and Sentieon Haplotyper and DNAscope to identify genetic variants, we characterized a total of 4,117,663 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 459,640 short insertions, and 509,218 short deletions in the patient’s genome (Figure 1 and Supplementary File 1, 2). Among the SNPs, the ratio between transition (Ti) and transversion (Tv)mutations is 1.97. The number of mutations and the Ti/Tv ratio are close to the expected values. A total of 31,644 (0.34%) SNPs were predicted to have high impacts (e.g., frame-shift and nonsense mutations) or moderate impacts (e.g., missense mutations) on gene function. We further annotated the population allele frequencies, the likelihood of deleteriousness, and the possible associations with the four reported diseases (see methods). Notably, the patient carries 14 pathogenic SNPs as indicated by ClinVar, but none of the annotated diseases matches with SLE, AAG, TTP, or LVNC (Supplementary Table 1).

For structural variants (SVs), Sentieon DNAscope identified a large number of false positive SVs with very short sequence segments (<50 bp) aligned to the human genomes and the rest as novel sequence insertions (Supplementary Figure 1). Since the patient’s genomic DNA was collected from a mouth swap and mixed with mouth microbiomes, the false SVs arose from mapping bacteria DNA to the human genome. After excluding these artifacts, we identified 184 SVs longer than 3,000 bp (Supplementary File 2 and Supplementary Table 2), affecting the coding sequences of 34 genes (Supplementary Table 3). However, none of the SV-affected genes have known associations with SLE, AAG, TTP, or LVNC.

Common genetic variants with polygenic effects on SLE

The genetic architecture for polygenic SLE typically involves common SNPs, defined as having population frequencies over 5%, that despite each having a small effect size, can sum up to a significant genetic risk for the disease. We compared the patient’s genotype with a multi-ancestry meta-analysis targeting the association between common SNPs and SLE. Out of 249 independent genomic loci associated with SLE, the patient carries signature SNPs in 149 loci (Table 1), indicating a substantial genetic risk. The 149 SNPs can be mapped to 120 protein-coding genes, which are significantly enriched in immune pathways based on gene ontology (Figure 2). The top SNP with the most significant association, rs10168266 (P = 1.0E-160), is a common, intronic SNP in gene STAT4 that is predicted to affect its expression level. Its encoded protein, STAT4, is a transcription factor that mediates the inflammatory responses to combat infections through activation by cytokine IL-12 and then, in turn, transcribes genes essential for the maturation of T helper cells. Genetic variants in STAT4 are known to increase the susceptibility to SLE and a more severe phenotype.

The analytic workflow to identify, annotate, and filter for the pathogenic genetic variants, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and structural variants (SVs), for the four disease condit

Figure 1. The analytic workflow to identify, annotate, and filter for the pathogenic genetic variants, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and structural variants (SVs), for the four disease conditions. SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus; AAG: Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy; TTP: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; LVNC: Left ventricular non-compaction.

CHRPOSIDALTGTP_VALUEREPORTED_GENE
chr2191071078rs10168266T0/11.00E-160STAT4
chr7128954129rs10488631C0/12.00E-143IRF5_-_TNPO3
chr1113834946rs2476601G1/14.00E-98PTPN22__AP4B1-AS1
chr7128933913rs4728142A0/17.00E-96KCP_-_IRF5
chr811491677rs13277113A0/11.00E-88BLK
chr1173257056rs704840G0/11.00E-46TNFSF4
chr634752016rs9469857T0/19.00E-45RPS10P13_-_SNRPC
chr2221585386rs5754217T0/17.00E-40UBE2L3
chr5160452971rs2431697C0/13.00E-37MIR3142HG
chr6106120159rs548234T1/11.00E-35ATG5
chr7129089074rs2084654G1/18.00E-35TPI1P2_-_CYCSP20
chr1910364976rs2304256A1/19.00E-35TYK2
chr2191108837rs6752770G0/13.00E-34STAT4
chr3119431242rs3732421G0/15.00E-32TMEM39A
chr12111569952rs653178T0/11.00E-31ATXN2
chr2191022906rs16833177C0/12.00E-31STAT4-AS1
chr1611100073rs3893660G0/13.00E-31CLEC16A
chr1173376445rs10753071A1/14.00E-28TNFSF4
chr811486171rs2254546G1/14.00E-28FAM167A_-_BLK
chr3160028076rs485499C0/15.00E-25LINC01100__IL12A-AS1
chr1062045858rs4948496C0/12.00E-24ARID5B
chr1048837411rs7922169G0/11.00E-23WDFY4
chr1739895095rs8067378G0/15.00E-23ZPBP2_-_GSDMB
chr1910334150rs2278442A1/13.00E-22ICAM3
chr2203843923rs231804T0/11.00E-20RNU6-474P_-_CTLA4
chr6137825911rs670369T1/13.00E-20WAKMAR2
chr625412759rs927984C1/11.00E-19CARMIL1__CMAHP
chr635149622rs1886243C0/13.00E-19TCP11_-_SCUBE3
chr4101816093rs10028805A1/14.00E-19BANK1
chr1135067136rs2732547C0/12.00E-18PDHX_-_CD44-DT
chr3119399949rs11712165G0/15.00E-18ARHGAP31
chr6137806067rs675640C1/16.00E-18LINC02539_-_WAKMAR2
chr230225478rs906868T0/11.00E-17H3P5_-_LBH
chr2162254026rs2111485G0/12.00E-17FAP_-_IFIH1
chr1685985027rs2280381T0/14.00E-17LINC02132_-_LINC01082
chr167354511rs6679356T1/18.00E-17IL12RB2
chr810332530rs7832708T0/11.00E-16MSRA
chr88252414rs2945230G0/11.00E-16FAM86B3P_-_PRAG1
chr1192567683rs2816316A1/12.00E-16RGS21_-_RGS1
chr167373890rs3828069C0/12.00E-16IL12RB2
chr1538541832rs8032939C1/14.00E-16RASGRP1
chr4971991rs11724804A0/14.00E-16DGKQ
chr1869867948rs1790588C0/17.00E-16CD226
chr358384450rs6445975T0/16.00E-15PXK
chr811514632rs11250141A1/16.00E-15BLK
chr625428726rs722086T1/17.00E-15CARMIL1__CMAHP
chr2203768433rs10932020A0/11.00E-14KRT18P39_-_NPM1P33
chr328034494rs427221C0/11.00E-14LINC01967
chr4101874688rs6816787A0/12.00E-14BANK1
chr11118638950rs483598G1/14.00E-14PHLDB1
chr11641563rs11246228C0/14.00E-14DRD4_-_DEAF1
chr1910491504rs11085735C1/14.00E-14KEAP1
chr625683052rs1883259C0/11.00E-13SCGN
chr1658219556rs2731783G1/12.00E-13RN7SL645P_-_CFAP263
chr1775330884rs4542691C0/12.00E-13GRB2
chr4102636062rs2866414T0/12.00E-13MANBA
chr7129101859rs4731549T0/12.00E-13TPI1P2_-_CYCSP20
chr690170674rs10944479A0/15.00E-13BACH2
chr6106135045rs742108A0/19.00E-13ATG5
chr1183412660rs11577151A0/11.00E-12NMNAT2
chr5100793209rs4703116C0/11.00E-12RN7SKP62_-_ST8SIA4
chr11128479083rs10790956G0/12.00E-12ETS1
chr1183291524rs946173G0/12.00E-12NMNAT2
chr1910289228rs2569693T0/12.00E-12LIMASI__ICAM4-AS1
chr5134084952rs244673A1/12.00E-12VDAC1_-_TCF7
chr5151097526rs4958890T0/12.00E-12TNIP1_-_ANXA6
chr625787589rs2096386A0/12.00E-12SLC17A1
chr810728173rs7836366G0/12.00E-12PINX1__SOX7
chr1164360951rs516124T0/13.00E-12RPS6KA4
chr1165775268rs489574A0/13.00E-12AP5B1
chr2102473668rs17027255T0/13.00E-12SLC9A4
chr2239325740rs12627970G0/14.00E-12RPL3_-_SYNGR1
chr142051099rs2042065C1/15.00E-12HNRNPFP1_-_GUCA2B
chr6137878280rs610604T0/15.00E-12TNFAIP3
chr634936315rs847852A0/16.00E-12ANKS1A
chr1161492938rs4657039G0/17.00E-12RNU6-481P_-_FCGR2A
chr1812797695rs2847297G0/17.00E-12PTPN2
chr192469854rs6662618G1/11.00E-11RN7SL824P_-_GFI1
chr1173197108rs1234313G0/12.00E-11TNFSF4
chr3159783884rs6441275A1/12.00E-11SCHIP1__IQCJ-SCHIP1
chr14102797451rs12148050G1/13.00E-11TRAF3
chr358346341rs4681679G1/13.00E-11PXK
chr690247744rs3757247T1/14.00E-11BACH2
chr6106136013rs12213031T0/15.00E-11ATG5
chr842283286rs4560769G0/15.00E-11IKBKB
chr9120927961rs3761847A0/15.00E-11TRAF1
chr1048768184rs17836440C0/16.00E-11WDFY4
chr1739354149rs9892055T0/16.00E-11FBXL20
chr625413694rs1543603G1/16.00E-11CARMIL1__CMAHP
chr3137049168rs17374749A0/18.00E-11IL20RB_-_RNA5SP142
chr167361470rs6685236A1/11.00E-10IL12RB2
chr2100142995rs11681966A0/11.00E-10AFF3
chr2190391157rs11892526T1/11.00E-10INPP1_-_MFSD6
chr2190754098rs4853732T0/11.00E-10NAB1_-_GLS
chr1611260640rs243325C1/12.00E-10RMI2
chr265365191rs6738087C1/12.00E-10SPRED2
chr625684177rs4711092C1/12.00E-10SCGN
chr811753534rs804283A0/12.00E-10GATA4
chr2134293051rs13014122A0/16.00E-10MGAT5
chr3119410956rs11714363A0/16.00E-10ARHGAP31
chr1910458967rs2358681C1/17.00E-10PDE4A
chr3121834872rs12490565A0/18.00E-10IQCB1
chr312218116rs310746T1/18.00E-10SYN2_-_GSTM5P1
chr1198687278rs2359952G0/11.00E-09PTPRC
chr2190316755rs291458C0/11.00E-09HIBCH
chr625437758rs6900224T0/11.00E-09CARMIL1__CMAHP
chr12120818717rs3883901C0/12.00E-09SPPL3
chr6137697302rs6917441G0/12.00E-09LINC03004
chr728145472rs849141G0/12.00E-09JAZF1
chr8128426805rs6470627G1/12.00E-09LINC00824
chr1611269835rs415595G0/13.00E-09RMI2
chr1657389946rs8063316T1/13.00E-09CX3CL1_-_CCL17
chr88957380rs11778913A0/13.00E-09RNU6-682P_-_SNORA70
chr1062664778rs10995263T0/14.00E-09LINC02929
chr11128416471rs1547892C0/14.00E-09LINC02098_-_ETS1
chr1235876577rs9782955C0/14.00E-09LYST
chr2190887601rs1921915A1/14.00E-09GLS
chr750209417rs11761913T0/14.00E-09SPMIP7_-_IKZF1
chr89109096rs17155242G0/14.00E-09ERI1
chr177323638rs35776863A0/15.00E-09NEURL4
chr636655123rs1321311A0/15.00E-09RNU1-88P_-_Y_RNA
chr5160470788rs1862390T1/16.00E-09MIR3142HG
chr12111489935rs7134740A0/17.00E-09ATXN2
chr2059159698rs1535271A0/17.00E-09ZNF831
chr556148813rs12515884C0/17.00E-09ANKRD55
chr1775420733rs9913538T0/18.00E-09RNU6-938P_-_Y_RNA
chr18422018rs301806T0/18.00E-09RERE
chr88901751rs332013C0/18.00E-09RNU6-682P_-_SNORA70
chr1062296309rs1835862A1/19.00E-09LINC02621
chr1183816708rs2500125C1/19.00E-09RGL1
chr625903080rs16891146A0/19.00E-09H2BP5_-_SLC17A2
chr1165784486rs479844G0/11.00E-08AP5B1_-_OVOL1
chr1196693329rs10922096C0/11.00E-08CFH
chr2203866221rs733618C0/11.00E-08CTLA4
chr5151109829rs1133202G0/11.00E-08ANXA6
chr625684051rs4712955G0/11.00E-08SCGN
chr2213011526rs12470231G0/12.00E-08IKZF2
chr4122631659rs2893008G0/12.00E-08IL21-AS1
chr5159288655rs4921458C0/12.00E-08UBLCP1_-_IL12B
chr1012445997rs6602588A0/13.00E-08CAMK1D
chr1183207295rs525410G0/13.00E-08LAMC2
chr6129873059rs6939565T1/13.00E-08TMEM244_-_L3MBTL3
chr7128785714rs339083T0/13.00E-08OPN1SW_-_CCDC136
chr636382113rs879036C0/14.00E-08ETV7
chr811246386rs958648G1/14.00E-08LINC00529
chr105844771rs2380205T0/15.00E-08GDI2_-_ANKRD16
chr1575071016rs1867147T0/15.00E-08PPCDC
chr2191220415rs6434455G1/15.00E-08MYO1B-AS1
chr3159992603rs583911A0/15.00E-08IL12A__IL12A-AS1

Table 1. 149 signature single-nucleotide polymorphisms with known association with systemic lupus erythematosus carried by the patients.

Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; POS, position; ALT, alternative allele; GT, genotype. 0/1: heterozygous alternative allele; 1/1: homozygous alternative allele.

The 120 protein-coding genes mapped by the signature single-nucleotide polymorphisms with known association with systemic lupus erythematosus are enriched in the immune response processes. The level o

Figure 2. The 120 protein-coding genes mapped by the signature single-nucleotide polymorphisms with known association with systemic lupus erythematosus are enriched in the immune response processes. The level of enrichment is measured by the signal, which is a weighted harmonic mean between the observed/expected ratio and the negative-log transformed false discovery rate (FDR). The biological process categories were grouped by similarity (shared genes > 0.8)

We further documented a total of 535 SNPs that were significantly associated with SLE in a total of 74 GWAS reports (Supplementary File 3). Notably, the significance of the associations, indicated by the P-values, depends on cohort sizes and ancestries and should, therefore, not be compared across different studies. In addition, the list includes SNPs in large gene families such as the mucin genes (e.g., MUC21) and the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes (e.g., HLA-DRA). The standard Illumina sequencing technology, however, generates short sequencing reads that are prone to misalignment across different gene paralogs, resulting in a large number of false positive SNPs. Despite being one of the most significantly associated loci for SLE, further tests are required to validate the identified SNPs in the complex region of HLA genes.

Unlike SLE, there are currently no systematic association studies for AAG, TTP, and LVNC due to their rareness. Thus, we did not report any common SNP that could be associated with these three diseases.

Rare, likely pathogenic genetic variants in disease-associated genes

Based on ten in silico prediction algorithms of the SNP effects, we report 570 rare, likely deleterious SNPs in the patient (Supplementary File 4). Five genes carried >=3 of such mutations, including C6orf10(N=3), DNAH1(N=3), HLA-DQB1(N=6), LILRA2(N=3), and USH2A(N=3). Gene C6orf10, also known as TSBP1, has been associated with autoimmune diseases, including SLE, in European and East Asian populations. Mutations in HLA-DQB1 will need independent validations. DNAH1, LILRA2, and USH2A have no known associations with the reported diseases. USH2A, for instance, is one of the largest genes and tends to contain more mutations. A sixth gene, PABPC3 (N=12*)*, was filtered as the mutations were likely alignment errors and failed on the manual inspection.

Most rare, likely deleterious SNPs affect the same genes once or twice. Using a list of 525 SLE-associated genes based on literature curation, we identified 17 genes with likely functional perturbations from rare SNPs, predicted by a minimum of two methods (Table 2). The two genes with the highest strength of functional associations are DNASE1 (rs1799891) and IL21R (rs146177564). DNASE1 encodes the enzyme DNase 1, which is localized in the zymogen granules of the nuclear envelope to break down DNA in a manner known as endonucleolytic cleavage. Anti-nuclear antibodies against naked DNA and intact nucleosomes are hallmarks of SLEs. A loss-of-function mutation in the DNASE1 gene could theoretically cause inadequate clearance of chromatin or chromatin-protein complexes following cellular apoptosis, therefore triggering the autoimmune responses. However, an in vitro assay found that rs1799891 is likely a gain-of-function mutation that upregulates the DNase 1 activity. Thus, until we can measure the IgG titer of dsDNA and nucleosomal antigens in the patients, the effect of the DNASE1 mutation, rs1799891, on SLE symptoms remains inconclusive.

IL21R encodes the cytokine receptor for interleukin 21 (IL-21) and is another known susceptibility gene for SLE. IL-21 is a pleiotropic cytokine with multiple effects on the immune system. Its receptor, IL-21R, is widely expressed in B cells, T cells, and natural killer cells but is underexpressed in SLE patients. This reduced expression has been significantly linked to elevated levels of anti-ds DNA antibodies and B lymphocytopenia (a decrease in B cells).

CHRPOSIDALTGTGENETYPE#METHODaSTRENGTHb
chr163657022rs1799891G0/1DNASE1(Pro154Ala)missense52.88
chr1627443024rs146177564T0/1IL21R(Arg161Cys)missense32.88
chr787531302rs2032582T0/1ABCB1(Ser893Thr)missense51.656
chr631816086rs562047C1/1HSPA1A(Glu110Asp)missense21.591
chr1395210754rs11568658A0/1ABCC4(Gly187Trp)missense81.306
chr9122381694rs5789A0/1PTGS1(Leu237Met)missense51.293
chr10128105328rs45549235A0/1MKI67(Ala2171Val)missense21.267
chr6121447661rs376074787C0/1GJA1(Ser272Pro)missense51.246
chr811845196rs79487342T0/1CTSB(Asp317Asn)missense31.238
chr1529732685rs759848653T0/1TJP1(Ala690Thr)missense41.214
chr1073915328rs72816325C0/1PLAU(Tyr350His)missense61.2
chr641936044rs1051130C0/1CCND3(Ser259Ala)missense21.156
chr20391432rs41281850A0/1TRIB3(Ser173Asn)missense71.123
chr1782091449rs759242677T0/1FASNstructural_interaction21.101
chr7100893176rs1799805T0/1ACHE(His353Asn)missense31.07
chr5169594617rs185497566C0/1SPDL1(Lys276Thr)missense61.029
chr1181089755rs3747951T0/1IER5(Pro285Ser)missense51.01

Table 2. 17 genes with rare, likely pathogenic mutations for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; POS, position; ALT, alternative allele; GT, genotype. 0/1: heterozygous alternative allele; 1/1: homozygous alternative allele.

a indicates the number of methods that predict the SNP to be deleterious.

b indicates the relative strength of functional association between the gene and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Using a similar approach, we curated a list of 78 LVNC-associated genes based on a systematic review, including 561 patients from 17 studies. The list of genes includes those related to sarcomeres (the basic contractile unit in muscle), arrhythmias (abnormal heartbeat), and mitochondrial functions, among others. The patient carries rare, deleterious SNPs in 5 of the 78 genes, including sarcomere genes MYBPC3, TNNT1, and OBSCN, arrhythmia gene ANK2, and a non-sarcomere non*-*arrhythmia gene PLEC (Table 3). Notably, OBSCN, ANK2, PLEC and especially TNNT1 are long genes, which may increase the likelihood of SNPs. Nevertheless, observing multiple gene mutations associated with LVNC suggests a significant genetic risk from rare SNPs. Among these, MYBPC3 encodes the cardiac isoform of myosin-binding protein and is exclusively expressed in cardiac muscle, where it plays a crucial role in regulating cardiac contraction. TNNT1 (also called TNT) encodes a large, abundant protein of striated muscle termed titin, and its truncation mutations are associated with a higher risk of heart failure among LVNC patients. The patient instead carries rs112562759 in TNNT1, a missense/splice variant, and the impact is expected to be lower than truncations. OBSCN encodes obscurin that interacts with titin and is involved in sarcomere assembly and development. ANK2 is highly expressed in the heart, and its protein is crucial for localizing and stabilizing ion transporters and ion channels in cardiomyocytes. Individuals carrying ANK2 variants displayed an increased maximum wall thickness in the left ventricle, which is characteristic of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Finally, PLEC encodes plectin, which links intermediate filaments (IFs) to Z-discs in sarcomeres and is essential for the proper cytoarchitecture during heart development. The same filtering criteria did not identify any rare, deleterious mutations in the risk genes, such as CHRNA3 for AAG or ADAMTS13 for TTP.

CHRPOSIDALTGTGENETYPE#METHODa
chr1228372266rs72762066T0/1OBSCN(Pro8120Leu)missense2
chr4113369549rs150808807G0/1ANK2(Gln3785Arg)missense2
chr8143930279rs369344419C0/1PLEC(Asp963Gly)missense8
chr1147333924rs11570112C0/1MYBPC3(Gln998Glu)missense&splice4
chr1955147019rs112562759C0/1TNNT1(Glu12Gly)missense&splice5

Table 3. 5 genes with rare, likely pathogenic mutations for left ventricular non-compaction.

Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; POS, position; ALT, alternative allele; GT, genotype. 0/1: heterozygous alternative allele; 1/1: homozygous alternative allele.

a indicates the number of methods that predict the SNP to be deleterious

Other candidate genetic variants in disease-associated genes

Despite our usage of 11 in silico methods, their combined power to predict SNP effects may cause under-reporting of pathogenic variants, especially for rare disorders. Thus, we reported 7 additional candidate pathogenic variants in the genes with known risks for SLE, AAG, and TTP (Table 4). Of these, rs45487196 is a rare, missense mutation (p.Val187Ile) in gene C1QC, which encodes the C-chain polypeptide of the complement subcomponent C1q. Monogenic mutations that led to C1q deficiency are currently acknowledged as one of the most significant genetic factors associated with SLE. The lack of C1q leads to poor clearance of dead cells, leading to intracellular molecules releasing and exposing, thus triggering the development of autoantibodies, as described in the Waste Disposal Theory for SLE. In addition, C1q can significantly activate DNase I in the clearance of chromatin derived from necrotic cells. Thus, despite rs45487196 being characterized as benign or tolerable for C1QC, it remains a possible pathogenic mutation through interactions or additive effects to the DNASE1 mutation (Table 3).

CHRPOSIDALTGTGENETYPEDISEASE
chr122647604rs45487196A (Val187Ile)0/1C1QCmissenseSLE
chr1578601522rs141141954T (Gly374Ser)0/1CHRNA3missenseAAG
chr9133447776rs655911C1/1ADAMTS13intronicTTP
chr9133460340rs2301615T1/1ADAMTS13downstreamTTP
chr9133460785rs1858879C1/1ADAMTS13downstreamTTP
chr9133466757rs28660186C1/1ADAMTS13downstreamTTP
chr9133474675rs4962155A1/1ADAMTS13downstreamTTP

Table 4. Additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG), and Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP).

Abbreviations: CHR, chromosome; POS, position; ALT, alternative allele; GT, genotype. 0/1: heterozygous alternative allele; 1/1: homozygous alternative allele.

In addition, the patient carries a rare, missense mutation in CHRNA3, rs141141954 (p. Gly374Ser), which is predicted to have a low impact on the protein function (Table 4). CHRNA3 encodes the neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-3 (nAChRα3), which is essential for ganglionic synaptic transmission and is the only known gene that increases genetic risk for AAG. Based on two familial AAG families, within which the disease was transmitted across generations, a frameshift mutation (p. Leu303Aspfs*115) and a missense mutation (p. Asp230Asn) in CHRNA3 were reported as the causal mutations. However, no other family members of the patient of our study have AAG. The mutated amino acid is also predicted to be intracellular and inaccessible by serum antibodies (Figure 3). Thus, unless rs141141954 is a de novo mutation unique to the patient and the intracellular mutation could affect the extracellular protein structures, rs141141954 likely had not played a causal role in the AAG disease.

The predicted protein structure of the neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-3, a protein associated with autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. The patient carries a missense mutation, Gly374Se

Figure 3. The predicted protein structure of the neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-3, a protein associated with autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. The patient carries a missense mutation, Gly374Ser, which is predicted to be in the cytoplasmic domain.

Biallelic (homozygous or compound heterozygous) pathogenic variants in the gene ADAMTS13 cause familial TTP, a rare form of TTP. The patient carries no exonic SNPs in ADAMTS13 but has five homozygous intronic or intergenic SNPs in the regulatory regions that could decrease the gene expression. Human endothelial cells from the blood vessels synthesize and release functional ADAMTS13 proteins into the blood. We searched for intronic or intergenic SNPs in the c (eQTLs) predicted to downregulate the ADAMTS13 transcription levels in the aorta or tibial arteries. Out of a total of 38 downregulating SNPs, the patient carries seven, 2 heterozygous and 5 homozygous, SNPs that could potentially reduce the expression of ADAMTS13 in the source cells and, in turn, decrease the ADAMTS13 protein in the blood (Table 4).

Discussion

In this study, we utilized state-of-the-art computational tools for analyzing the genomic sequence of a patient with a rare combination of diseases, including SLE, AAG, TTP, and LVNC. After applying thorough filters to eliminate noise and conducting comprehensive literature reviews of known genetic factors, we identified likely pathogenic mutations in the patient’s genome across various categories. These include a significant number of common mutations shared with others that pose modest, predisposing risks, as well as several rare mutations that are unique to the patient and likely have a greater impact on their diseases. As expected, the majority of the mutations are linked to conditions that have a well-established genetic basis, such as SLE and LVNC. Notably, the list of reported genetic risks may be biased towards autosomes (i.e., non-sex chromosomes). This is likely due to standard genotyping methods, such as the SNP arrays used in previous GWAS analyses and the short-read DNA sequencing employed in this study, which can produce false mutations due to sequence homology between the X and Y chromosomes.

One of the other main challenges in identifying the credible genetic factors in the patient lies in the rarity of her disease. Globally, approximately 7,000 rare diseases, defined as fewer than 1 in 15,000 individuals in the United States or under 1 in 2,000 in Europe, have been identified thus far. While each rare disease affects a small segment of the population, together, approximately 350 million people worldwide are impacted, leading to life-threatening challenges or chronic disabilities. It is estimated that around 80% of these diseases have a genetic basis. However, most patients remain without a genetic diagnosis. The symptoms of rare diseases frequently mimic those of more prevalent conditions, complicating the diagnostic process. Additionally, these diseases can exhibit highly individualized characteristics influenced by a combination of genetic factors and environmental conditions.

Creating direct collaborations and sharing information between patients, physicians, and researchers is crucial for addressing the specific challenges associated with rare or complex diseases. Our analysis of the presented case is limited by the current understanding of the diseases’ etiology and its interactions. However, we believe that the study model, which promotes multidisciplinary collaboration and includes a direct partnership with the patient, will encourage similar case studies in the future. This approach will help accumulate more cases that can be cross-referenced, addressing the challenge posed by the limited occurrence of rare diseases. As sequencing costs continue to decrease and genomic data expands, this study model will also enhance research accessibility for patients.

Acknowledgments

This work utilized computing resources provided by the Stanford Genetics Bioinformatics Service Center and the City University of Hong Kong high-performance computing (HPC) resources.

Funding: This work was supported by the City University of Hong Kong New Faculty Fund 9610590.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Code Availability

The code used in this study is in Supplementary File 5.

Supplementary Information

Methods

Whole genome sequencing and genetic variant calling

DNA extracted from the patient’s saliva sample was used for whole genome sequencing on the Illumina sequencing platform for an average sequencing depth of 51×. The sequencing reads were aligned to the human reference genome hg38 containing alternative and decoy sequences (http://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/technical/reference/GRCh38_reference_genome/GRCh38_full_analysis_set_plus_decoy_hla.fa), using the alt-aware aligner BWA (v0.7.12). The germline single nucleotide polymorphisms and short insertions and deletions were identified by the Sentieon DNAseq pipeline (v202308.03) and the structural variants were called using the Sentieon DNAscope pipeline (v202308.03). The overall analytic workflow is summarized in Figure 1, and the code is in Supplementary File 5.

Annotation of the genetic variants

The basic function and effects of the detected genetic variants were first annotated using SnpEff(v4.3t). Next, SnpSift(v4.3t) was employed to further filter low-quality (<100) variant calls and annotate the variants, including (1) known clinically pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations based on the ClinVar database, (2) population allele frequencies of the alternative alleles based on the ExAC database, (3) SNP effects with up to 11 in silico prediction algorithms as summarized by the dbNSFP database (v4.1), and (4) known SNPs with significant associations to SLE risk based on the genome-wide association studies catalog.

Filtering for rare, likely pathogenic SNPs

Rare SNPs were defined as those with a global allele frequency below 5%, based on the ExAC database. The SNP effects were reported with 10 in silico prediction methods, including (1) CADD, (2) SIFT, (3) PROVEAN, (4) MutationTaster, (5) MetaSVM, (6) LRT, (7) FATHMM (8) Polyphen2_HVAR, (9) Polyphen2_HDIV, and (10) MutationAssessor. A pathogenic SNP is defined if it was predicted to be intolerant or related to disease in at least two methods (Table 2 and Table 3).

Expression Quantitative Trait Loci for ADAMTS13

9,446 single tissue expression quantitative trait loci and tissue combinations that could significantly affect ADAMTS13 expression levels were obtained from the Genotype-Tissue Expression database. We filtered for the homozygous SNPs that could downregulate ADAMTS13 expression, with a normalized effect size less than -0.2, in blood vessels (Aorta or Tibial).

Supplementary Figures, Tables, and Data

**All non-linked supplementary files are available by request only. Please email us at: journal@researchtothepeople.org to request access.

Misalignment of microorganism-derived sequencing reads leads to false insertion structural variations calls.

Figure S1. Misalignment of microorganism-derived sequencing reads leads to false insertion structural variations calls.

Supplementary Table 1. 14 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations annotated by the ClinVar database.

Supplementary Table 2. 184 structural variants between 3 and 100kb.

Supplementary Table 3. 28 genes affected by structural variants.

Supplementary File 1. All single nucleotide variants and short insert or deletions identified by the Sentieon DNAseq pipeline, with SNPeff and SNPsift annotation.

Supplementary File 2. All structural variants identified by the Sentieon DNAscope pipeline.

Supplementary File 3. 535 SNPs with significant associations to systemic lupus erythematosus.

Supplementary File 4. 570 rare, likely deleterious SNPs.

Supplementary File 5. Code used in the bioinformatics pipeline.

Supplementary File 5 Code.txt
Supplementary Fig 1.ai
01
Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Svenson LW. (2018). Real-world incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in Alberta, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4091-4
02
Li S, Gong T, Peng Y, Nieman KM, Gilbertson DT. (2019). Prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus and associated outcomes in the 2009–2016 US Medicare population. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203319888691
03
Costenbader KH, Gay S, Alarcón-Riquelme ME, Iaccarino L, Doria A. (2012). Genes, epigenetic regulation and environmental factors: Which is the most relevant in developing autoimmune diseases?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2011.10.022
04
Moser KL, Kelly JA, Lessard CJ, Harley JB. (2009). Recent insights into the genetic basis of systemic lupus erythematosus. https://doi.org/10.1038/gene.2009.39
05
Vinuesa CG, Shen N, Ware T. (2023). Genetics of SLE: mechanistic insights from monogenic disease and disease-associated variants. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-023-00732-x
06
Nakane S, Mukaino A, Higuchi O, Yasuhiro M, Takamatsu K, Yamakawa M, Watari M, Tawara N, Nakahara K, Kawakami A, Matsuo H, Ando Y. (2020). A comprehensive analysis of the clinical characteristics and laboratory features in 179 patients with autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102403
07
Wang Z, Low PA, Jordan J, Freeman R, Gibbons CH, Schroeder C, Sandroni P, Vernino S. (2007). Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000263185.30294.61
08
Shibao CA, Joos K, Phillips JA, Cogan J, Newman JH, Hamid R, Meiler J, Capra J, Sheehan J, Vetrini F, Yang Y, Black B, Diedrich A, Roberston D, Biaggioni I. (2021). Familial Autonomic Ganglionopathy Caused by Rare CHRNA3 Genetic Variants. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000012143
09
Kremer Hovinga JA, Coppo P, Lämmle B, Moake JL, Miyata T, Vanhoorelbeke K. (2017). Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.20
10
Nusrat S, Beg K, Khan O, Sinha A, George J. (2023). Hereditary Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14101956
11
Joly BS, Coppo P, Veyradier A. (2017). Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-10-709857
12
Towbin JA, Ballweg J, Johnson J. (2018). Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802393-8.00020-x
13
Pignatelli RH, McMahon CJ, Dreyer WJ, Denfield SW, Price J, Belmont JW, Craigen WJ, Wu J, El Said H, Bezold LI, Clunie S, Fernbach S, Bowles NE, Towbin JA. (2003). Clinical Characterization of Left Ventricular Noncompaction in Children. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000100664.10777.b8
14
Ross SB, Jones K, Blanch B, Puranik R, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Semsarian C. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of left ventricular non-compaction in adults. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz317
15
van Waning JI, Caliskan K, Hoedemaekers YM, van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, Baas AF, Boekholdt SM, van Melle JP, Teske AJ, Asselbergs FW, Backx AP, du Marchie Sarvaas GJ, Dalinghaus M, Breur JM, Linschoten MP, Verlooij LA, Kardys I, Dooijes D, Lekanne Deprez RH, IJpma AS, van den Berg MP, Hofstra RM, van Slegtenhorst MA, Jongbloed JD, Majoor-Krakauer D. (2018). Genetics, Clinical Features, and Long-Term Outcome of Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.019
16
van Waning JI, Moesker J, Heijsman D, Boersma E, Majoor‐Krakauer D. (2019). Systematic Review of Genotype‐Phenotype Correlations in Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.119.012993
17
Roriz M, Landais M, Desprez J, Barbet C, Azoulay E, Galicier L, Wynckel A, Baudel J, Provôt F, Pène F, Mira J, Presne C, Poullin P, Delmas Y, Kanouni T, Seguin A, Mousson C, Servais A, Bordessoule D, Perez P, Chauveau D, Veyradier A, Halimi J, Hamidou M, Coppo P. (2015). Risk Factors for Autoimmune Diseases Development After Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001598
18
Hassan A, Iqbal M, George JN. (2019). Additional autoimmune disorders in patients with acquired autoimmune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25466
19
Ozkok A, Acar G, Elcioglu OC, Bakan A, Atilgan KG, Sasak G, Alisir S, Odabas AR. (2012). Cardiomyopathy mimicking left ventricular noncompaction in a patient with lupus nephritis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13730-012-0015-4
20
Bortoluzzi A, Piga M, Silvagni E, Chessa E, Mathieu A, Govoni M. (2019). Peripheral nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective study on prevalence, associated factors and outcome. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203319828499
21
Bhatia NL, Tajik AJ, Wilansky S, Steidley DE, Mookadam F. (2011). Isolated Noncompaction of the Left Ventricular Myocardium in Adults: A Systematic Overview. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.002
22
Li H, Durbin R. (2009). Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
23
Freed D, Pan R, Chen H, Li Z, Hu J, Aldana R. (2022). DNAscope: High accuracy small variant calling using machine learning. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.20.492556
24
Gojobori T, Li W, Graur D. (1982). Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01733904
25
Petrov DA, Hartl DL. (1999). Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1475
26
1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, Abecasis GR. (2015). A global reference for human genetic variation. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15393
27
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown G, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, Gu B, Hart J, Hoffman D, Hoover J, Jang W, Katz K, Ovetsky M, Riley G, Sethi A, Tully R, Villamarin-Salomon R, Rubinstein W, Maglott DR. (2015). ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1222
28
Harley IT, Sawalha AH. (2022). Systemic lupus erythematosus as a genetic disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2022.108953
29
Khunsriraksakul C, Li Q, Markus H, Patrick MT, Sauteraud R, McGuire D, Wang X, Wang C, Wang L, Chen S, Shenoy G, Li B, Zhong X, Olsen NJ, Carrel L, Tsoi LC, Jiang B, Liu DJ. (2023). Multi-ancestry and multi-trait genome-wide association meta-analyses inform clinical risk prediction for systemic lupus erythematosus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36306-5
30
Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, Gable AL, Fang T, Doncheva NT, Pyysalo S, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C. (2022). The STRING database in 2023: protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1000
31
Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, Lewis S, the AmiGO Hub, the Web Presence Working Group. (2008). AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn615
32
GTEx Consortium. (2013). The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2653
33
Hagberg N, Joelsson M, Leonard D, Reid S, Eloranta M, Mo J, Nilsson MK, Syvänen A, Bryceson YT, Rönnblom L. (2018). The STAT4 SLE risk allele rs7574865[T] is associated with increased IL-12-induced IFN-γ production in T cells from patients with SLE. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212794
34
Sollis E, Mosaku A, Abid A, Buniello A, Cerezo M, Gil L, Groza T, Güneş O, Hall P, Hayhurst J, Ibrahim A, Ji Y, John S, Lewis E, MacArthur JAL, McMahon A, Osumi-Sutherland D, Panoutsopoulou K, Pendlington Z, Ramachandran S, Stefancsik R, Stewart J, Whetzel P, Wilson R, Hindorff L, Cunningham F, Lambert SA, Inouye M, Parkinson H, Harris LW. (2022). The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1010
35
Barcellos LF, May SL, Ramsay PP, Quach HL, Lane JA, Nititham J, Noble JA, Taylor KE, Quach DL, Chung SA, Kelly JA, Moser KL, Behrens TW, Seldin MF, Thomson G, Harley JB, Gaffney PM, Criswell LA. (2009). High-Density SNP Screening of the Major Histocompatibility Complex in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Demonstrates Strong Evidence for Independent Susceptibility Regions. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000696
36
International MHC and Autoimmunity Genetics Network (IMAGEN)*, Rioux JD, Goyette P, Vyse TJ, Hammarström L, Fernando MMA, Green T, De Jager PL, Foisy S, Wang J, de Bakker PIW, Leslie S, McVean G, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L, Annese V, Hafler DA, Pan-Hammarström Q, Matell R, Sawcer SJ, Compston AD, Cree BAC, Mirel DB, Daly MJ, Behrens TW, Klareskog L, Gregersen PK, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL. (2009). Mapping of multiple susceptibility variants within the MHC region for 7 immune-mediated diseases. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909307106
37
Chung SA, Taylor KE, Graham RR, Nititham J, Lee AT, Ortmann WA, Jacob CO, Alarcón-Riquelme ME, Tsao BP, Harley JB, Gaffney PM, Moser KL, SLEGEN, Petri M, Demirci FY, Kamboh MI, Manzi S, Gregersen PK, Langefeld CD, Behrens TW, Criswell LA. (2011). Differential Genetic Associations for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Anti–dsDNA Autoantibody Production. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001323
38
Zhang Y, Zhou X, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Lau Y, Yang W, Zhang H. (2021). Shared genetic study gives insights into the shared and distinct pathogenic immunity components of IgA nephropathy and SLE. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-021-01798-7
39
Ma'ayan A. (2016). The harmonizome: a collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1113435.1
40
Diamant I, Clarke DJB, Evangelista JE, Lingam N, Ma’ayan A. (2024). Harmonizome 3.0: integrated knowledge about genes and proteins from diverse multi-omics resources. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1080
41
Samejima K, Earnshaw WC. (2005). Trashing the genome: the role of nucleases during apoptosis. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1715
42
Pisetsky DS, Lipsky PE. (2020). New insights into the role of antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0480-7
43
Kimura-Kataoka K, Ueki M, Takeshita H, Fujihara J, Iida R, Kawai Y, Yasuda T. (2014). Identification of the Functional Alleles of the Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Potentially Implicated in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Human Deoxyribonuclease I Gene. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2014.2368
44
Webb R, Merrill JT, Kelly JA, Sestak A, Kaufman KM, Langefeld CD, Ziegler J, Kimberly RP, Edberg JC, Ramsey‐Goldman R, Petri M, Reveille JD, Alarcón GS, Vilá LM, Alarcón‐Riquelme ME, James JA, Gilkeson GS, Jacob CO, Moser KL, Gaffney PM, Vyse TJ, Nath SK, Lipsky P, Harley JB, Sawalha AH. (2009). A polymorphism within IL21R confers risk for systemic lupus erythematosus. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24658
45
Mitoma H, Horiuchi T, Kimoto Y, Tsukamoto H, Uchino A, Tamimoto Y, Miyagi Y, Harada M. (2005). Decreased expression of interleukin-21 receptor on peripheral B lymphocytes in systemic lupus erythematosus. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.16.4.609
46
Carrier L, Mearini G, Stathopoulou K, Cuello F. (2015). Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3) in cardiac pathophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.09.008
47
Li S, Zhang C, Liu N, Bai H, Hou C, Song L, Pu J. (2019). Titin‐truncating variants are associated with heart failure events in patients with left ventricular non‐compaction cardiomyopathy. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23172
48
Young P, Ehler E, Gautel M. (2001). Obscurin, a giant sarcomeric Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor protein involved in sarcomere assembly. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200102110
49
Sucharski HC, Dudley EK, Keith CB, El Refaey M, Koenig SN, Mohler PJ. (2020). Mechanisms and Alterations of Cardiac Ion Channels Leading to Disease: Role of Ankyrin-B in Cardiac Function. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020211
50
Lopes LR, Syrris P, Guttmann OP, O'Mahony C, Tang HC, Dalageorgou C, Jenkins S, Hubank M, Monserrat L, McKenna WJ, Plagnol V, Elliott PM. (2014). Novel genotype–phenotype associations demonstrated by high-throughput sequencing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306387
51
Andrä K, Lassmann H, Bittner R, Shorny S, Fässler R, Propst F, Wiche G. (1997). Targeted inactivation of plectin reveals essential function in maintaining the integrity of skin, muscle, and heart cytoarchitecture. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.23.3143
52
Manderson AP, Botto M, Walport MJ. (2004). The Role of Complement in the Development of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104549
53
Gaipl US, Beyer TD, Heyder P, Kuenkele S, Böttcher A, Voll RE, Kalden JR, Herrmann M. (2004). Cooperation between C1q and DNase I in the clearance of necrotic cell–derived chromatin. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20034
54
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, Bridgland A, Meyer C, Kohl SAA, Ballard AJ, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Petersen S, Reiman D, Clancy E, Zielinski M, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, Berghammer T, Bodenstein S, Silver D, Vinyals O, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
55
Seidizadeh O, Cairo A, Mancini I, George JN, Peyvandi F. (2024). Global prevalence of hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura determined by genetic analysis. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013421
56
The Lancet Global Health. (2024). The landscape for rare diseases in 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00056-1
57
Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. (2012). A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695
58
Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM, Lu X. (2012). Using Drosophila melanogaster as a Model for Genotoxic Chemical Mutational Studies with a New Program, SnpSift. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00035
59
Karczewski KJ, Weisburd B, Thomas B, Solomonson M, Ruderfer DM, Kavanagh D, Hamamsy T, Lek M, Samocha KE, Cummings BB, Birnbaum D, The Exome Aggregation Consortium, Daly MJ, MacArthur DG. (2016). The ExAC browser: displaying reference data information from over 60 000 exomes. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw971
60
Liu X, Li C, Mou C, Dong Y, Tu Y. (2020). dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9
61
Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. (2018). CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1016
62
Ng PC. (2003). SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg509
63
Choi Y, Chan AP. (2015). PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195
64
Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. (2010). MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0810-575
65
Kim S, Jhong J, Lee J, Koo J. (2017). Meta-analytic support vector machine for integrating multiple omics data. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0126-8
66
Chun S, Fay JC. (2009). Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092619.109
67
Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GLA, Edwards KJ, Day INM, Gaunt TR. (2012). Predicting the Functional, Molecular, and Phenotypic Consequences of Amino Acid Substitutions using Hidden Markov Models. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22225
68
Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. (2013). Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen‐2. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76
69
Gnad F, Baucom A, Mukhyala K, Manning G, Zhang Z. (2013). Assessment of computational methods for predicting the effects of missense mutations in human cancers. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-s3-s7

Be the first to comment on this publication.